Sunday, February 3, 2013

Week 3


Does the use of comics and graphic novels within the primary literacy curriculum undermine the values of the classroom or do they offer opportunities for learning?

 
Comics have been found to contribute to children’s literacy development (Guzzetti, 2007).  However, this view is not shared by everyone, comics have received sever criticism and even banning at times (Millard and Marsh, 2001).

Millard and Marsh (2001) claimed that comics rarely appear on the classroom shelves.  Some teachers choose to exclude comics, due to believing that children deserve better quality reading matters and the concerns of the suitability of the content (Millard and Marsh, 2001 and Stafford, 2009). Comics have been viewed to undermine reading skills (Educational Scotland). This could be due to people believing illustrations are only used for children who are unable to read (Millard and Marsh, 2001). However, teachers reported in Millard and Marsh’s (2001) research that, some children’s reading development improved due to the comic project. Graphic novels and comics have encouraged and motivated children to want to read (Educational Scotland and Milliard & Marsh, 2001). This view was shared with a teacher who believed that using comics/ graphic novels in Literacy would motivate a child who sometimes needed encouragement to complete the work. As comics play an important part of the child’s daily life.

Comic books and graphic novels have been used to support children’s Literacy development (QCA/UKLA, 2005).  The QCA/ UKLA’s (2005) research shows how comics and graphic novels can be used to develop children’s: comprehension, understanding of developing a narrative for the reader and punctuation. I had not thought about using comics and graphic novels to develop children’s comprehension. However, the QCA/UKLA has influenced me to use comics/ graphic novels for children who need to develop their inference skills within my planning. This could be achieved by using speech and thought bubbles. A teacher who had taken part in Millard and Marsh’s (2001) research stated that, comics were beneficial as it encouraged the children to read both visual and print elements. This is supported by Rakes (1999, cited in Frey and Fisher, 2008) who claimed that, combining visuals and text can improve children’s comprehension development.  This could be due to children drawing on their experiences when looking at the illustrations (QCA/UKLA, 2005).

 
Frey, N.E and Fisher, D.B. (2008) Teaching Visual Literacy London: Sage

Guzzetti, B. (2007) Literacy for the new Millennium Westport: Praeger Publishers
Learning and Teaching Scotland: Graphic Novels in the Curriculum http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/resources/g/graphicnovels/intro.asp

Millard and Marsh (2001) ‘Sending Minnie the Minx Home: comics and reading choices’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 31:1, 25 – 38
Stafford, T. (2009) ‘Teaching Comics’ in Duncan, D. (2009) Teaching Children’s Literature: Making stories work in the classroom Abingdon: Routledge

QCA/UKLA (2005) More than words 2: Creating Stories on page and screen. London: QCA.

 

1 comment:

  1. It is interesting to read that comics had sometimes previously been banned from being used in the classroom. As from reading your research and my own it is clear they are really beneficial in Literacy, I found making our own comic made this clear to me, through the use of speech and the design of the comic to create meaning.

    ReplyDelete